How do spoken language and text language influence each other?

Text language and  spoken language influence each other in different ways

Firstly, the paralinguistic features used in spoken language can be conveyed in text language. This can be done via the use of two asterisks to recreate a physical gesture, an example being that if a person considered what they have said to be wrong, or idiotic, they would say ‘ *facepalm* ‘. This  represents they would be resting their head in their hands, and have acknowledged what they have said is incorrect.

On the other hand, spoken language is influenced by text language. Evidence of this is the word ‘seeya‘. The words ‘see‘ and ‘you‘ have been shortened and merged together, to make it easier and quicker to type into a phones keypad. This example shows how text language has entered the everyday spoken language of normal people.

Finally, spoken language influences text language in the form of emoticons. These are used in a text conversation to express emotions. Emoticons replace the paralinguistic feature of facial expression that occurs in spoken conversation, which people can read to mean sarcasm and to show emotion. Without emoticons, sarcasm would be undetectable due to the fact that sarcasm is expressed through the paralinguistic feature of facial expression and the prosodic features of tone and pitch, which cannot be conveyed in text language.

To conclude, text language is primarily influenced by spoken language in the form of techniques used to make up for the lack of paralinguistic features, an example being emoticons. Furthermore, spoken language is influenced by text language in abbreviations, for example, ‘ seeya ‘, that are used to make typing words shorter.


Posted

in

, , , ,

by

Tags:

Comments

2 responses to “How do spoken language and text language influence each other?”

  1. Christopher Waugh Avatar

    Alex,

    This is a very concise answer to the question. Its strengths are that it considers both sides of the discussion – describing both how text language is influenced by speaking and vice-versa. Your continuing to explore the translation of sarcasm to text is a good choice as (as you say) sarcasm is a linguistic feature that depends on prosodic and paralinguistic features.

    You are ready now to start to look at the bigger picture. This would be stimulated by answering some how? and why? questions.

    Examples of these include:

    1) Why do we affect these paralinguistic and prosodic features in text messaging as opposed to other forms of written communication?
    2) Are features of text language used for precisely the same reasons when they are transferred to spoken language?

    A criticism of this analysis is that the example you gave for the transfer of features from text into speech was a little weak. Not that you’d be expected to know this, but ‘seeya’ has been in informal use in speech since before the mobile phone was invented. Can you think of an example that is more specific and unique to modern text-language?

    To take your analysis even further (that’s not something I’m asking you to do today) you will want to contemplate issues such as: what effect does the short delay of text messaging have on the discourse? Is anything lost when these paralinguistic features are turned into emoticons? Where do you think language is going, given the increasing influence of technology on the way we communicate? What is an accent, in the world of text?

    Thanks for taking the time to write on your blog. I hope my feedback makes it worth the trouble.

    Mr Waugh

  2. […] A sample of Alex’s writing that shows promise […]

React!